A circular system archetype diagram for a landfill-centered context. This is where “waste management” can evolve into
“resource management” via organics diversion, energy recovery, and soil-building co-products.
How this site was selected: Mapping layers pair feedstocks with infrastructure, the matrix approach (industrial/hauling, feedstock variation, pyrolysis, space/expansion) distills the strongest candidates, and the 25-50 mile coverage logic keeps proposals balanced. Read the methodology.
System diagram
Tip: open this in a new tab to zoom, then use it in meetings as a shared reference.
Note: Landfill sites tend to involve a “stack” of parallel opportunities: RNG / LFG capture upgrades,
organics diversion, leachate management, and adjacent processing (composting, digestion, biochar). The right path depends
on current permits and operator incentives.
Site imagery
Reference photos from the Circular Biogas Systems proposal appendix for this location.
Loading images…
Biosolids flow snapshot
This 2015 snapshot shows how landfilled biosolids move through the Hudson Valley system, connecting tipping, hauling, and final disposal.
The landfilled flows chart highlights consolidated disposal, hauling, and staging areas this archetype manages.
HVB does not support co-digestion of sewage sludge with food waste; treat this as routing context and a guardrails trigger.
Data & maps hub — ground each archetype in the baseline data, flows, and county briefs before pitching it.
Policy & funding hub — choose the right story (CLCPA, diversion, EJ) for this system.
CLCPA brief — tie the archetype into the state’s climate accountability framework.
Food waste law brief — highlight the diversion/compliance rationale when organics are on the route.
Why RNG viability matters
Capturing RNG at this landfill links methane reduction to waste diversion while nudging the interconnection upgrades (utility pipelines or RNG offtake) that prove this project can deliver clean gas at scale.